👀 Digital ID, A Tool To Control Thee?

This week, once again, Tony Blair has been bleating on about ID cards. For decades now, often in the face of fierce resistance from his Tory opposition, such opposition that scrapped his national ID card scheme back in the Coalition Government. Then Home Secretary Theresa May reportedly had the hard drives storing our information gobbled up by a grinding machine in Essex. Then came the pandemic, and Blair was back arguing that vaccine passports meant it was time for such ID; then, earlier this week, he teamed up with the bloke that used to spar with him at the dispatch box, William Hague, to make the case once more.

The pair produced a paper together via Blair’s Institute for Global Change, entitled ‘A New National Purpose: Innovation Can Power the Future of Britain’. One of the flagship proposals is the idea that our smartphones should contain a designed ‘digital ID’. Arguing in an age of the on-demand economy in which you can find a date, order dinner or scroll through Twitter getting yourself wound up by bad opinions, digital ID would make life easier for everyday public services, with your passport, driving licence, tax records and qualifications all held on your phone.

The journalist Ross Clark, who we had on this channel the other week, reckons this is a step towards China’s Orwellian social credit system; he asks too if the British state has become any more capable at doing big IT projects since Blair wasted £10 billion on a scrapped plan for digitising the NHS? Let’s not forget that the NHS Covid app, Track & Trace, had tens of billions spent on it and wasn’t brilliant either.

So joining Darren Grimes to discuss is James Woudhuysen, Visiting Professor of Forecasting and Innovation at London Southbank University, a specialist in IT, Energy and Asia.

Follow James on Twitter:
Check out James’ blog:


To make sure you never miss a single Reasoned video, click here to subscribe:

Reasoned is fan-funded through monthly and one-time donations:


Follow Reasoned on Facebook:
Follow Reasoned on Twitter:
Follow Reasoned on Instagram:
Follow Darren on Twitter:
Follow Darren on Facebook:
Follow Darren on Instagram:
Follow Darren on Locals:

Written by Reasoned

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings


  1. ​It's all part of the plan to bring in CBDC's.

    "There are too many sausages in your basket sir…. you bought steaks yesterday".
    "Sorry sir, you can't buy these cakes, your sugar allowance is used up."
    "…with my judgement today……You will be no longer able to use public transport for 6 months."

  2. There's a complete absence of accountability when it comes to AI. It's worse than "computer says no", if you want to query why it said no, there's literally nothing you can go look at. With an actual person you can at least ask the question. The problem here is neither Haigh nor Blair have the first clue what they're talking about. They don't know anything about this subject.

Russia AND China Demand UN Investigation Into Nord Stream Bombing

Russia AND China Demand UN Investigation Into Nord Stream Bombing

Australia is in a rental crisis yet the Labor Government

Australia is in a rental crisis yet the Labor Government is importing more people – 15.02.23