in ,

Excess deaths in young adults, 2022 data

In 2022, 7.8% more young adults died than in 2019, this is outrageous and demands an official (credible) explanation

https://actuaries.org.uk/news-and-media-releases/news-articles/2023/jan/17-january-23-cmi-says-2022-had-the-worst-second-half-for-mortality-since-2010/

Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) is publishing frequent UK mortality analysis

Today’s updates cover week 1 of 2023 (to 6 January)

Mortality for 2022 as a whole was 4.5% higher than 2019,

but 7.8% lower than in 2020

2.2% lower than in 2021

There is a striking difference in how mortality rates in 2022 compare to 2019 at different ages

2.5% higher for ages 75-84

7.8% higher for ages 20-44

In the UK, there have been around 155,300 more deaths from all causes than expected from the start of the pandemic to 6 January 2023

Of these

72,900 occurred in 2020

47,500 in 2021

31,000 in 2022

In the UK, the second half of 2022

26,300 excess deaths,

compared to 4,700 in the first half of 2022

The number of deaths registered in England & Wales in week 1 of 2023

3,437 higher than if mortality rates had been the same as in week 1 of 2019;

equivalent to 30% more deaths than expected

Cobus Daneel, Chair of the CMI Mortality Projections Committee

Although weekly excess mortality in the second half of 2022 wasn’t nearly as high as the peaks earlier in the pandemic, it was persistent.

This led to more excess deaths in the second half of 2022 than in the second half of any year since 2010.

Excess mortality has been particularly high recently with more than 7,000 excess deaths over the three weeks to 6 January 2023.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/davos-2023-pfizer-ceo-evades-questions-on-covid-vaccine-efficacy-watch-video-101674203439039.html

Albert Bourla, Chief Executive Officer, Pfizer

World Economic Forum meeting

Series of tough questions about the efficacy Covid vaccine

Thank you very much

Have a nice day

India, minister for state for information and technology. Rajeev Chandrasekhar

Just to remind all Indians, that Pfizer tried to bully Govt of India into accepting conditions of indemnity

2nd December 2020

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html

The UK government has granted pharmaceutical giant Pfizer a legal indemnity protecting it from being sued,

enabling its coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out across the country as early as next week.

16th December 2020

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-vaccines-idUSKBN28Q014

Britain to spend ÂŁ3.7 billion on vaccines and bear liability, watchdog says

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain has agreed to spend 3.7 billion pounds on COVID-19 vaccines and in most cases will bear the liability if claims are made against the pharmaceutical firms involved, the National Audit Office (NAO) said on Wednesday.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-commencing-4-january-2021/freedom-of-information-request-on-covid-19-vaccine-liability-foi-20-532

I would like to know what the indemnity/ liability clauses are with the vaccine that is to be rolled out this month.

Furthermore I would also like to know who is liable for any adverse side effects that occur.

The MHRA holds no information on this. We recommend that you contact NHS England for this information,

I would also like to know why Pfizer and the NHS staff administering the doses required full indemnity?

The MHRA holds no information on this. We recommend that you contact NHS England for this information,

Written by Dr. John Campbell

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

28 Comments

  1. Our Governments forced vaccines and now boosters still neglect basic health screening and treatment. Vote them all out, out, out and demand that the new government investigate these excess deaths since this COVID 'pandemic' which the WHO has not yet said is over.

  2. Why does it say the highest excess deaths since 2010?
    So this level of excess deaths is not unprecedented then? This has happened before, and outside any pandemic context?
    It's like global warming fans who try to ignore the purely natural cooling then warming of the "mini ice age" circa 1300-1500.
    Such patterns as these can occur naturally.
    Please tell me where I'm wrong.

  3. The 'psych-war' strategy is now clear – expose the population to the notion of millions of excess deaths via a virus, then unfold the 'only solution' as containment via lockdown. When the 'restraints' are gone, well, what do you expect – more death. No inspection of the methods of constraint themselves – no acceptance of their actual cost. There has to be a total negation of these processes amongst us, but we still have a way to go until that becomes evident to all.

  4. I'm just wondering if the very young like 3-5 year olds also have excess deaths. They would have been born to unvaccinated mothers and are much less likely to have been vaccinated themselves. Do you have those figures? Many of us desperately want to blame the "vaccine" and the new technology. If the very young are also dying at incredible rates we might be able to change our focus and honestly regain some hope for all our vaccinated loved ones. Kind of morbid but that might be the most revealing.

  5. I believe the precedent for vaccine company indemnification originated with liability stemming from the US Swine Flu debacle of 1976 which resulted in neurologic complications. The bill S3735 of 1976 was created to indemnify vaccine companies from liability associated with vaccine injury.

  6. It’s amazing how Russia/ Iran are criticised by western media / social media platforms for lack of democracy and freedom of speech . Yet in Britain courtesy of YouTube Dr John is muzzled and can’t express himself freely without loss of his channel? For surely unless we wake up western democracies are just mere names but have turned despots .

Low Distressed Sale Counts Do Not Prove The Property Market

Low Distressed Sale Counts Do Not Prove The Property Market Is Fine!

The TRUTH About Jacinda Ardern – WEF Stooge

The TRUTH About Jacinda Ardern – WEF Stooge